My desire to ensure environmental sustainability.

Point blank on environmental issues.

Friday, 29 May 2015

The Satoyama

Nature is one of the most inseparable aspects when it comes to human life. It is through nature that we get our live moving; talk of the air that we breathe, water for various uses, and land. Therefore, it calls for utmost care of these three basic components of our environment. This is the reason why I want to talk about the “Satoyama,” one of the most practical ways that address natural resource management in an efficient and effective manner in Japan.
Various definitions have been coined to define “Satoyama.” The word itself is a derivation of two words, i.e. “Sato,” which is a Japanese name for a village, and “Yama,” a Japanese name for people. Yokohari and Bolthouse (2011) define the Satoyama as a holistic interlink of various units such as settlements, forests, rice paddies, agricultural fields, grasslands, and woodlands, in one place. Satoyama can also refer to a landscape that consists of managed community woodlands and forests (Yokohari & Bolthouse, 2011; Takeuchi et al., 2003). According to Tsuchiyaa, Okurob, and Takeuchi (2013), Satoyama is a perfect woodland management system. Notably, all these definitions have incorporated the aspect of communities acting in a coordinated manner to manage nature for a common benefit. Therefore, a Satoyama can be simply defined as a system where there is perfect co-existence between people and nature.
Although the Satoyama is mostly practiced in Japan, there is an ongoing interest from all over the world owing to its benefits. Indeed, such trends confirm that Satoyama might be the future management system for human-ecological systems worldwide (Indrawana, Yabeb, Nomurac, & Harrison, 2014). In a Satoyama, people interact with nature in various ways with an aim of getting the maximum from nature and at the same time, ensuring that nature’s status or condition remains intact.
Through proper management, a Satoyama can ensure harvest of various products such as timber and other non-timber products like charcoal, mushrooms, wild vegetables and wild foods. A Satoyama also has grasslands for feeding of livestock, constructions materials especially for thatching houses, and sometime beddings and fertilizer. Rice paddies and other agricultural field in a Satoyama ensure that there is sufficient food supply for the people that live in it. Specifically, the grasslands and woodlands in a Satoyama act as habitats thus increasing the biodiversity levels. This means that with a Satoyama, one creates almost a perfect society where nature and humans interact for each other’s benefit.
I believe that having or living in a Satoyama is a dream that most of us could like to accomplish. Breathing fresh air, feeling the presence of nature in the proximity of your homestead, and most importantly, being plenty supply of foods from the Satoyama! It is high time that we embraced such systems for the sake of our current lives and a sustainable future.

References

Indrawana, M., Yabeb,M., Nomurac, H., Harrison, H. (2014). Deconstructing satoyama- socio-ecological landscape in Japan. Ecological Engineering, 64, 77–84.      
Takeuchi, K., et al. (2003). Satoyama: Traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo.
Tsuchiyaa. K., Okurob, T., Takeuchib, K. (2013). Combined effects of conservation policy and co-management alter the understory vegetation of urban woodlands: Case study in the Tama Hills area, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 87–98.
Yokohari, M., Bolthouse, J. (2011). Keepit alive,don’tfreeze it: Conceptual perspectiveonthe conservationof continuously evolving satoyama landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. Eng., 7, 207–216.

            

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

The Possibility of Green Cities

When we hear of the word “green,” we always think of nature; i.e. forests, grasslands, botanical gardens, orchards. On the other hand, the word “cities” keeps us oriented to a scenario of an artificial system that replaces nature; i.e. full-range infrastructure that includes buildings, roads, industrial and sports areas. That brings the question of how these two words (green and city) can exist in one place. It is truly possible to have nature deeply ingrained in a system full of anthropogenic activities! This is possible in various ways.
Specifically, there needs to be policies and laws that guide the planning of cities. This will ensure an organized system of carrying out activities the city. For instance, Japan has an Urban Planning Law that was set up in 1968 and this has had a great positive impact in relation to having green cities in Japan (Tsuchiyaa, Okurob, Takeuchi, 2013). Indeed, one cannot miss to include the word “green” when defining any Japanese city. This Urban Planning Law divides the city into two major areas; the first one referred to as the Urbanization Promotion Areas and the second one called Urbanization Control Areas. In this case, Urbanization Promotion Areas refer to those areas that can be freely used for urban development purposes such as construction of buildings and roads. On the other hand, there is no urban development that is allowed in Urbanization Control Areas. Practical examples of Urban Control Areas are parks and they the best when it comes to conservation of woodlands areas in cities (Tsuchiyaa et al., 2013). This means that some section of the city will remain intact and free from any form anthropogenic activity thus maintaining the nature, while another section will give way for infrastructural development thus a city.
It becomes a big challenge to have green cities in most countries because there are no urban planning policies established. Equally, there might be the policies but the implementation is not done because of either poor governance, lack of funds and expertise or, absence all these factors.  A closer look at Nairobi city (Kenya) displays some form of an existing urban planning law, which is not strictly implemented. Nairobi city has numerous parks, with some such as Uhuru Park and Central Park, located just a stone-throw form the CBD. Despite evidence of some routine maintenance of these parks, it is disheartening that some have been totally ignored. One of such is the Nairobi City Park, that used to be famous for its scenic sites that attracted an aura of events like wedding receptions and recreational activities. However, credit has to be given to some efforts shown in protecting some of the Nairobi City green areas like Arboretum and Karura Forest that within which the Unite Nation Environment Program (UNEP) is located. Unfortunately, these efforts are not good enough because the rest of the green areas have been encroached by people leading to mushrooming of estates and other human activities. Indeed, this proves Luck, Smallbone, and O’Brien’s (2009) findings that, human activities negatively affect green areas in urban areas.  With continued encroachment, we may soon lose all green areas in the city. This calls for urgent actions from the respective authorities and agencies to tackle the issue.
Conclusively, it is possible to have green cities in not only formulation of working urban planning policies, but also their actual implementation. This will ensure environmental sustainability thus posterity. Indeed, green cities are inevitable in the current world where global warming and climate change effects keep on worsening each day!
References
Luck, G. W., Smallbone, L. T., & O’Brien, R. (2009). Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: Patterns in space and time. Ecosystems, 12, 604–620.
Tsuchiyaa. K., Okurob, T., Takeuchib, K. (2013). Combined effects of conservation policy and co-management alter the understory vegetation of urban woodlands: Case study in the Tama Hills area, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 87–98.


Monday, 7 April 2014

It is no longer Waste

Now, most of us believe that old toilet materials, especially the ceramics, become waste immediately we replace them with new ones. Could it because they are associated with "human waste," that we cannot reuse them? No! I think is lack of some basics on how one can recycle such materials...did you know that the ceramics could be turned into cement? Yes, the old ceramic toilet sitters and tanks could be actually crushed into fine particles, and finally cement. Indeed, Treacy's article, "Old toilets, other ceramic waste can be made into "greener" cement," discusses the process in detail:
ceramic castaways, as well as bricks, can be used to make a cement that's just as strong as traditional cement, but through a process that's much less dirty.
A more shocking revelation is that another waste material is used as an activator. According to Treacy, rice husk can be used instead of sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, meaning it is such an economical process that minimizes on costs and environmental damage. This type of cement is even much stronger than normal cement...wow! Great one there, and everyone is on the know.

Source: Tree Hugger 
-Abednego Osindi (Bsc. Environmental Science, UoN)-
© 2014. All rights reserved @Abedos Media!

 

Friday, 28 March 2014

Who is Fooling Who?

It is just a few hours I heard of a poaching incident in the Lake Nakuru National Park. In less than a week, poaching cases have been reported in the media for one too many times. For sure, as an animal and nature lover, all these stories keep me thinking "What is next for our Heritage?" "Are the Responsible bodies doing quite enough?" "What about the government?" "Could it be that somebody somewhere is sleeping on their job?" "Mwanakenya?"Or, "Who is Fooling who?" For sure, the Kenyan heritage is running down the drain while responsible bodies and the government are on the on look, Mwanakenya getting fooled all the way, and what is remaining are just mere consolations of "We Are on the Lookout!"
The other day, I watched the "Poachers and Butchers"  investigative piece by KTN's Dennis Onsarigo and it just drove me nuts! I may not be an expert in analyzing the details but for sure, my understanding would not lie that there is much truth in it. Truth that, somebody somewhere, so influential, affluential, and powerful is sitting at the throne of the "Kenya Wildlife Poaching Kingdom." It is in no doubt that the unemployed Kenyans have so much pride and satisfaction getting employed and manning "our" wild animals from killing by fellow poor Kenyans, while making sure that the animals are poached by the "Kingpins" as Onsarigo puts it. What made me convinced over this claim are the series of explanations Onsarigo gives; first, the controversies surrounding the killings of people linked to have information about the "powerful" people involved in poaching, second, the fact that poachers carrying ivory or rhino horns always escape but the rest are always shot, the "obsolete" weaponry found with poachers, and lastly but not least, the poaching occurs in most secure parks and sanctuaries of Kenya. Certainly, an higher authority must be in the know-how of all these!
Coincidentally, I read another shocking revelation on the linkage of Al-Shabaab to ivory trade. The Al-Shabaab have great connections in East Africa especially Kenya, where they manage to trade in ivory in the most lucractive exchanges ever witnessed. According to Kalron, the article author, this might be the reason why the Al-Shabaab never get short of finances to purchase heavy machinery and take care of its men:
A quick calculation puts Shabaab’s monthly income from ivory at between US$200,000 and US$600,000. Maintaining an army of roughly 5,000 men, each earning US$300 USD, demands at least US$1,500,000 a month, of which the ivory trade can supply a big chunk of it. 
So, somebody could ask how the two stories connect? The answer is very simple; remember the Kenyan army (KDF) has been deployed in Somalia to "finish" the Al-Shabaab, meaning the Al-Shabaab is deemed a big enemy by Kenya. Secondly, Onsarigo's investigative piece links powerful, and well-informed Kenyans to the ivory trade, where we have seen that the the Kenyan enemy (i.e. Al-Shabaab) is one of the intermediaries. I mean, why can't the government and responsible authorities take this chance to weaken Al-Shabaab financial sources, because it is clear that ivory is furnishing them? Could it be that fighting Al-Shabaab in Somalia is another "cover-up" tactic as the one reported in Onsarigo's "Poachers and Butchers?" While the ordinary Mwanakenya is advised to use Wildleaks in reporting the crimes, methinks it is time to demand for not only answers, but the RIGHT answers as to "Who is Fooling Who?"   

-Abednego Osindi (Bsc. Environmental Science, UoN)-
© 2014. All rights reserved @Abedos Media!

Monday, 18 November 2013

THE GREEN POPE



The first one in centuries,
To display efforts,
Towards environmental conservation,
He has gone green.


Believes in the warning,
Of human induced global warming,
And obtained an electric car,
To take him around Vatican.


May soon put up a parsnip garden,
Highly recommended for lent consumption,
Its roots survive in winter,
As Christians survive in lent,

Will cast out evil with Angelica,
That blooms on Michael The Archangels' day,
He knows Coriandrum sativa,
One of the bitter herbs during the Passover.

Christians all over the world,
Already have a spear header,
In environmental sustainability,
He is one of our own.

Francis of Assisi,
Our  patron saint of Ecologists,
Pray for us,
That we may live by this.

All rights @Aosindi 2012!